Search results
Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states can require an advertiser to disclose certain information without violating the advertiser's First Amendment free speech protections as long as the disclosure requirements are reasonably related to the State's interest in ...
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a court-appointed attorney filed a motion to withdraw from the appeal of a criminal case because of his belief that any grounds for appeal were frivolous . The Supreme Court ruled that any such motion must be accompanied by a brief (commonly referred to ...
v. t. e. Child-selling is the practice of selling children, usually by parents, legal guardians, or subsequent custodians, including adoption agencies, orphanages and Mother and Baby Homes. Where the subsequent relationship with the child is essentially non-exploitative, it is usually the case that purpose of child-selling was to permit adoption .
The client refuses to follow the advice of counsel, or engages in acts relating to the representation without informing the attorney or seeking the attorney's advice. The attorney is engaged with co-counsel of the client's choosing, and is unable to work with that co-counsel. Rules governing withdrawal
A social worker in Ohio was left struggling to pay her bills and feed her family after a simple Subway order set her back a whopping $1,021.50. With a bill that size, it would be reasonable to ...
This Ohio man with triplets and a sick wife overdraws his bank account on a 'weekly basis' — Dave Ramsey bluntly told him to feed the kids before paying MasterCard Vishesh Raisinghani January 21 ...
Here’s what you need to know about the tax implications of selling a family heirloom. ... But each situation is unique — and stepped-up basis is just one of many rules that govern the complex ...
The kids for cash scandal centered on judicial kickbacks to two judges at the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, US. [1] In 2008, judges Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella were convicted of accepting money in return for imposing harsh adjudications on juveniles to increase occupancy at a private prison operated ...