Tech24 Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene...

    Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938), was a case of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the federal government's power to prohibit filled milk from being shipped in interstate commerce. In his majority opinion for the Court, Associate Justice Harlan F. Stone wrote that economic regulations were "presumptively constitutional ...

  3. Lawrence v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

    In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito responded to the dissent opinion's concerns, saying that the ruling would not affect other substantive due process cases. [ 91 ] [ 92 ] [ 90 ] In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas , wrote, "In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents ...

  4. Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut

    Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [1] The case involved a Connecticut "Little Comstock Act" that prohibited any person ...

  5. Michael H. v. Gerald D. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.

    XIV. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving substantive due process in the context of paternity law. Splitting five to four, the Court rejected a challenge to a California law that presumed that a married woman's child was a product of that marriage, holding that the ...

  6. Buck v. Bell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

    Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ...

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Miller Brothers Co. v. Maryland. 347 U.S. 340 (1954) use tax imposed by one state against merchant in another state violated Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Racial Segregation. 347 U.S. 483 (1954) reversed the ruling of Plessy v.

  8. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    t. e. Substantive due process is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect substantive laws and certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if they are unenumerated elsewhere in the U.S. Constitution. Courts have asserted that such protections come from the due process clauses ...

  9. Jackson v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Indiana

    Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that determined a U.S. state violated due process by involuntarily committing a criminal defendant for an indefinite period of time solely on the basis of his permanent incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him.