Tech24 Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network
  2. Lambert v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_v._California

    Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the defense of ignorance of the law when there is no legal notice. [1] The court held that when one is required to register one's presence, failure to register may be punished only when there is a probability that the accused party had knowledge of the law before committing the crime of failing to ...

  3. Smith v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._California

    Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (1959), was a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the freedom of the press.The decision deemed unconstitutional a city ordinance that made one in possession of obscene books criminally liable because it did not require proof that one had knowledge of the book's content, and thus violated the freedom of the press guaranteed in the First Amendment. [1]

  4. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment...

    Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that struck down a 2005 California law banning the sale of certain violent video games to children without parental supervision. In a 7–2 decision, the Court affirmed the lower court decisions and nullified the law, ruling that ...

  5. California court says Yelp can’t be forced to remove negative ...

    www.engadget.com/2018-07-03-california-court...

    The California Supreme Court has now issued a decision on the case and it agrees that in this situation, Yelp shouldn't be forced to remove the reviews in question. The case has been followed ...

  6. Court blocks key part of California law on children's online ...

    www.aol.com/news/injunction-against-california...

    August 16, 2024 at 8:32 PM. By Jonathan Stempel. (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Friday left intact a key part of an injunction blocking a California law meant to shield children from online ...

  7. Adamson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamson_v._California

    U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV. Overruled by. Malloy v. Hogan (1964) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Its decision is part of a long line of cases that eventually led to the Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

  8. Uber and Lyft had time to comply with the law. They did not.

    www.engadget.com/uber-lyft-ab5-gig-economy...

    The appeals process could go on for months, as both Uber and Lyft attempt to buy more time. ... It’s a result of a landmark 2018 California Supreme Court ruling which required the so-called ...

  9. California Courts of Appeal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Courts_of_Appeal

    The California Courts of Appeal are the state intermediate appellate courts in the U.S. state of California. The state is geographically divided along county lines into six appellate districts. [1] The Courts of Appeal form the largest state-level intermediate appellate court system in the United States, with 106 justices.