Tech24 Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network
  2. Goss v. Lopez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goss_v._Lopez

    Goss v. Lopez. The students' suspension from a public school without a hearing violated the due process right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), was a US Supreme Court case. It held that a public school must conduct a hearing before subjecting a student to suspension.

  3. Pierce v. Society of Sisters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters

    Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 269 U.S. 510 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court striking down an Oregon statute that required all children to attend public school. [1] The decision significantly expanded coverage of the Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to recognize ...

  4. Everson v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everson_v._Board_of_Education

    Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that applied the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to state law. [1] Before this decision, the clause, which states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion", [2] imposed limits only on the federal ...

  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    The Supreme Court ruled that the mandatory maternity leave rules were unconstitutional under the Due Process Clauses in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Essentially, the rules were found to be too arbitrary (fixed dates chosen for no apparent reason) and irrebuttable (having no relation to individual medical conditions and with no way to ...

  6. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    Arnett v. Kennedy. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that: certain public-sector employees can have a property interest in their employment, per Constitutional Due Process. See Board of Regents v. Roth. this property right entails a right to "some kind ...

  7. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    Other antebellum cases on due process include Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., which dealt with procedural due process, [14] but the Supreme Court subsequently characterized the rationale of Murray, in the case of Hurtado v. California, as not providing "an indispensable test" of due process. [15]

  8. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Regents_of_State...

    I, XIV. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning alleged discrimination against a nontenured teacher at Wisconsin State University-Oshkosh . David Roth was hired as a first year assistant professor of political science in 1968 for a fixed term of one year ...

  9. Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_Perez_v._Sturgis...

    Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 598 U.S. 142 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) can proceed without exhausting the administrative procedures of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA ...