Tech24 Deals Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network

2. This $12 Gold Bond anti-aging lotion for crepey skin is an ...

   www.aol.com/lifestyle/gold-bond-age-renew-lotion...

   Gold Bond Age Renew Crepe ... than 13,000 Amazon shoppers leaving glowing reviews, but it's also been voted the 2022 Product of the Year in the skin-care category of a 40,000-person consumer ...

3. Gold Bond - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Bond

   Gold Bond is a brand of over-the-counter skin care products produced by Chattem of Chattanooga, Tennessee, now a subsidiary of the French pharmaceutical company Sanofi. It is available as both a powder and a topical cream. Gold Bond is used to curb moisture, control odor, and soothe minor skin irritations, notably jock itch.

4. CPSC says Amazon is responsible for hazardous items from ...

   www.engadget.com/cpsc-says-amazon-is-responsible...

   The US Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined that Amazon is responsible for hazardous or defective products sold by third-party retailers through its platform. The CPSC unanimously ...

5. Amazon says it will now compensate consumers for defective ...

   techcrunch.com/2021/08/10/amazon-says-it-will...

   This situation recently came to a head, when last month Amazon was sued by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which aims to force Amazon to accept responsibility for recalling ...

6. Carlson (company) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlson_(company)

   Carlson. Carlson is an American privately held company headquartered in Minnetonka, Minnesota, United States. Its primary subsidiaries is Carlson Private Capital Partners, a family office that manages the owners' wealth. It previously held interests in hotels, including Radisson Hotels, and restaurants, including TGI Fridays.

7. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose_Corp._v._Consumers...

   U.S. Const. amend. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (1984), was a product disparagement case ultimately decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held, on a 6–3 vote, in favor of Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, ruling that proof of "actual malice" was necessary ...