Search results
Results from the Tech24 Deals Content Network
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the protections of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [ 1] The ruling expanded the Fourth Amendment's protections from an individual's "persons, houses ...
VIII, XIV. Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether the excessive fines clause of the Constitution 's Eighth Amendment applies to state and local governments. The case covered the asset forfeiture of the petitioner's truck after the police found a small quantity of drugs ...
Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. IV. Bailey v. United States, 568 U.S. 186 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning search and seizure. [1] A 6–3 decision reversed the weapons conviction of a Long Island man who had been detained when police followed his vehicle after he left his apartment just before it was to be searched.
The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule ), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a " warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage " does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, "unless there is some other legal basis for the ...
In the 1946 case of Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. Walling, [21] there was a distinction made between a "figurative or constructive search" and an actual search and seizure. The court held that constructive searches are limited by the Fourth Amendment, where actual search and seizure requires a warrant based on “probable cause”.
In the United States, the plain view doctrine is an exception to the Fourth Amendment 's warrant requirement [ 1] that allows an officer to seize evidence and contraband that are found in plain view during a lawful observation. The doctrine is also regularly used by Transportation Security Administration officers while screening people and ...
The Fourth Amendment intends to protect people from “unreasonable searches and seizures” by the US government. This is where we get legal protections like warrants, where law enforcement needs ...
The cases these courts hear can vary tremendously from county to county." [ 2 ] For example, in Howard County, Indiana , with a population of less than 100,000, [ 3 ] the Circuit Court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases and exclusive jurisdiction over juvenile cases, [ 4 ] while the Superior Court 1 primarily hears ...